Ethanol Fuel - Lobbyists and the Government Scam Us All - the Oil Companies Profit

August 27th, 2009 Leave your comment »
green oil
Michael Cooper asked:


You’ve heard the hype, the ‘Flex Fuel Vehicles’, the ‘E85 Green Fuel’, the ‘Ethanol Blended Gas’. Oil companies are touting their embrace of Ethanol as them going green, but how green is Ethanol really?

What is Ethanol fuel?

Ethanol is a grain alcohol. It’s also commonly known as Ethyl Alcohol or hydroxyethane. The Ethanol used in fuel for cars is denatured (you can’t get drunk off of it) and is primarily made from corn. This is where one of the largest issues comes from. Growing corn for the Ethanol is not the most efficient use of energy or resources. It costs more to grow and harvest corn than many other fuels. The planting, fertilizing, harvesting, transportation and refining of the corn is actually a net-negative energy expense. Basically it uses more fuel to harvest and truck it around than we get from it.

All cars can burn a mild blend of Ethanol and Gasoline, usually 10% Ethanol and 90% Gasoline. Flex Fuel Vehicles can run regular gas, all the way up to 85% Ethanol and 15% gasoline.

Burning Ethanol made from corn is bad for the environment.

You’re kidding, right? I get asked this a lot. Look it up, though. Don’t take my word for it, check The Google. You’ll find that the only people really promoting using Corn for Ethanol are lobbyists and farmers unions that need to give their farmers something to grow. Interestingly enough, the oil companies have no issues at all with Ethanol as an alternative fuel.

I really didn’t have to look hard or long to find out why.

As it turns out, Ethanol fits nicely with the current refinement and distribution system that the oil companies have in place. Ethanol still takes big plants to refine and the distribution channels to gas stations remains the same. We’re still all stuck burning a fuel that they deliver to us. Sure they don’t have the oil revenue, but that’s getting more and more expensive to obtain all the time. With the government subsidizing corn for Ethanol it’s quite cheap to get. That explains why nearly all fuel at the pump is already E10 (10% Ethanol) or E6 in California.

Give that some thought. Your tax dollars are paying to subsidize the growing of corn that is being sold nice and cheap to the oil companies who are turning around and selling it to you at 40 cents a gallon. That’s right; you are paying twice for 40 cents on the gallon. As the price of gas goes up that will soon hit $1. I can barely fathom a system where we pay the government to give fuel to the oil companies who then charge us for it.

It all goes one step further. The whole notion of using corn for fuel would be a lot more reasonable if the government hadn’t stopped subsidizing the rail lines. Rail can haul cargo with unbelievable efficiency. A train can move a ton of cargo 413 miles on a gallon of diesel. That is compared to the average car which can move 2 tons (with passengers) 30 miles on a gallon of fuel. That’s 680% more efficient, or the equivalent of getting about 204 miles per gallon from your car.

Yet the government has ceased supporting smaller cargo train lines and now millions of tons of cargo is hauled on the highways, wearing them down and consuming much, much more fuel than if it were hauled by train, and they subsidize the industry that does this, and not the one that is 680% more efficient and that is going away.

Completely Ridiculous.

There are some interesting possibilities out there, Soy being one of them. There is a possibility that soy could be used to make Ethanol and Biodiesel, but that is some time away. All the while other, valid fuels are being ignored, or under-researched. One being Hydrogen/HHO conversion from water, and another being advances in solar panels that could drastically increase their performance and our ability to have completely electrical cars.

Though we doubt you really ever believed them, don’t drink in the Oil Company’s kool-aid the next time you see one of their commercials touting how green they are. The diesel fuel it takes to haul that corn to the refinery they own is making them so much money that they are laughing all the way to the bank.



Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google
  • LinkedIn
  • Live
  • MySpace
  • Propeller
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • YahooMyWeb

Learn Information About Alternative Fuel - Green Fuel Options

August 18th, 2009 Leave your comment »
hydro fuel
Bryan Burbank asked:


It is important that we use alternative fuel sources so that we can reduce greenhouse emissions. There are many alternatives to the standard old fossil fuels but people need to be proactive in using them. There are many issues involved with fuels and alternatives but we can solve any of these issues so we have multiple fuel sources. We must realize that the oil that we are currently using will run out someday. Using other alternative sources such as natural gas can help to reduce pollution in the air.

Get Free : Alternative Fuel Information

We have made some changes to vehicles so that they can run on alternative fuel sources but we need to continue these changes. There are a fraction of vehicles that will run on natural gas and Hydro but there is not nearly enough to make a huge impact on the environment.

Save with : Great Fuel Tips

Hopefully with the current gas crisis there will be some mandatory changes so that people have a choice of which type of fuel they want to put in their vehicle. Once you give people a choice and there is a source where they can purchase the new alternative they will use it.

You also should be aware that fuel costs in your home can be expensive and also can pollute the environment. You are considered some of the alternative fuels that are available to you. I think when we combine saving money along with saving the environment we will create many options that will be available to everybody.

Remember that using alternative fuel can help save you money along with the environment. It is always a good idea to get educated and know what fuel alternatives are available for you. You can also be proactive with government and getting more laws passed so that it is mandatory that we have more options available to us.



Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google
  • LinkedIn
  • Live
  • MySpace
  • Propeller
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • YahooMyWeb

Green Fuels - the Facts

August 15th, 2009 Leave your comment »
green oil
Mervyn Rees asked:


(c) 2008 Mervyn Rees

Have you heard about cars that run on peanut oil? Well when Rudolph Diesel invented his engine  the ones we now run on what has become known as ‘diesel’ (Named after him) he ran his on peanut oil.

Nowadays all sorts of vegetable oils are being used to replace traditional diesel and, not least, petroleum. In the UK, a few thousand cars are already being run on used chip oil (that’s the oil that fries/chips have been made in), which, on such a small scale, is a good thing. The issue is, recycled cooking oils in the UK, can only produce about 100,000 tons of diesel per year, and that’s no more than 1/380th of the total fuel used through road transport alone. What, you have to wonder, would happen to the rest?

We’d obviously have to grow oil producing crops in order to run our cars on “environmentally friendly” fuel. Shouldn’t be too difficult, should it? Just plant some fields with rape, and before you know it, you’re turning oil into fuel and our air becomes a lot cleaner.

But is it really as easy as that? Let’s look at the specifics around this.

1 hectare of rape will yield an average of 1.5 tonnes of bio-diesel. In order to run the same number of road transport vehicles as there are today in the UK, rape would need to be grown on almost 26 million hectares of land.

Considering that the UK only has a little less than 6 million hectares of arable land available, where on Earth are we going to grow the rest? That’s it, somewhere else on Earth. Once again the 3rd world countries will undoubtedly end up producing the oil we need in order to run our cars in an “environmentally friendly” manner, while those who farm the land can barely afford to eat, let alone run a car. Better for the environment? Maybe, but better for society as a whole: Definitely not.

And while we’re growing oil-seed on so much of the land, where will our food be grown? Can we really produce the amount of oil needed to fuel the number of vehicles that are found on the road today, let alone in the future?

Then there’s the question of the actual production process connected with bio-diesel. Rape seed doesn’t become bio-diesel of its own accord, after all. The seed will need to be transported to processing plants where energy is used to transform it into something more environmentally friendly than gasoline or other petroleum based fuels. But how much gas and/or electricity will be used to run the machinery needed to process the oil? And how much energy will be needed in order to heat and light the processing plants? And where will the plants be built?

Whether so-called “green diesel” will really be better for the environment is anybody’s guess. We know they won’t omit damaging carbon dioxide, but everything has a price. What price can we afford to pay?

P.S. I have some knowledge of another source of Bio-Fuel supplies that could sort it…

But I’m afraid you’ll have to wait for another article to read about it, and my own ideas are perhaps progressing to. . .



Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google
  • LinkedIn
  • Live
  • MySpace
  • Propeller
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • YahooMyWeb

Hydrogen Fuel Stations: Wave of the Future

July 31st, 2009 Leave your comment »
hydro fuel
Fei Lim asked:


You may have heard about hydrogen fuel recently. Hydrogen is the same chemical used as fuel by the sun, and when you burn it, you get lots of energy and very little pollution; burned efficiently, the only by-product is water. Even better, hydrogen is the most abundant element in the universe, and can be processed from the same water that it creates in an endless cycle We have the technology right now to build hydrogen-powered cars. So why don’t you see them all over the road?

Because we do not yet have the infrastructure. In order to make hydrogen fuel a viable alternative to fossil fuels, we need to have a strong hydrogen fuel station infrastructure - a network of fueling stations throughout the country. After all, how would you fuel your gas-based car if you didn’t have a gas station to stop at?

How Hydrogen Fuel Stations Work

There are two different types of hydrogen fuel stations right now: public stations, located only in a very few areas and concentrated in Southern California, and home stations, built into garages and set up with complex systems to provide appropriate water and energy supplies.

Both types of hydrogen fuel stations create hydrogen on the spot using some form of electricity, from standard power hookups to solar power cells. The cheapest hydrogen fueling stations are based around solar power cells. Water is purified, usually through reverse osmosis, and put through electrolysis with power provided by the solar power cells. The process of electrolysis divides water into its component atoms hydrogen and oxygen, and the hydrogen is stored in a separate tank. Oxygen may be stored, or it may be released as a non-polluting by-product.

The result: if you have a home station, you fuel your car for free (provided you’ve used solar energy), and if you don’t, you fuel it up at the public station using an air-hose style pump and pay whatever the charge is

Where Are Hydrogen Fuel Stations Located?

With the exception of Southern California, you won’t find many hydrogen fuel stations yet. There are a handful in Europe, where they are used to power hydrogen buses. Iceland is the first country to implement a nationwide process of replacing traditional fuel stations with hydrogen stations. Japan, always fast to embrace new technology, is following suit, and you’ll find scattered fuel stations in a few other places: New York City, Washington DC, and British Columbia (in advance of the 2010 Winter Games).

The problem right now isn’t a lack of technology. Instead, it’s three other very practical considerations:

* The cost of building a hydrogen fuel station is prohibitive, though it will certainly drop in the future, and currently only projects subsidized by a government are viable.

* There isn’t a huge demand for hydrogen fuel stations yet, partly because there aren’t enough stations to support a large number of hydrogen cars yet.

* All hydrogen stations must be built in population-dense areas right now, so the range of hydrogen cars is limited, which limits their use enough to discourage widespread adoption.,

A combination of consumer demand and government subsidy is certain to edge hydrogen fuel stations to the point where they become a viable and vital part of our transportation networks.

It is certain that when we do have adequate infrastructure to support hydrogen-based vehicles, energy prices will drop sharply and output of carbon-based pollution will follow suit. Not only is the technology clean and reliable, it’s probably going to be a new starting point for a burst of human development, just as the first steam engine, the first car, and the first airplane were.

So when will this be? Current estimates put widespread adoption of hydrogen cars at about five years. The process may be accelerated by government support of fuel station building, but it’s more likely that the process will be a little slower, with the dense metropolitan areas adopting long before more remote areas and private fleets adopting the technology before anyone else.



Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google
  • LinkedIn
  • Live
  • MySpace
  • Propeller
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • YahooMyWeb

Emaya on Fossil Fuel Alternatives

July 27th, 2009 Leave your comment »
hydro fuel
Dilip Dahanukar asked:


The three computer entities, Uncle Guhu, Brother Miki and Bitsy researched alternatives to fossil fuel energy and put out an email through eMaya. Fololowing is an excerpt from the book ‘eMaya’ www.trafford.com/08-0434 : 

     Guhu opened the conversation. “There is a general belief that most of the fossil fuel, coal, gas and oil, is used to make electricity. But that’s not true. I found from the US Energy Information Administration (EIA), there is 15 TWh (trillion watt hours) of energy consumed by the World every hour, of which only 5.5 TWh are electricity.”

    Miki couldn’t believe it. He said, “Then what is the rest for?”

    Guhu replied, “There is a lot used for making steam in the chemical and food industry, there is a fair amount for making cement, there is a large amount used in heating homes, some is used in transport and most of the rest is used for cooking food!”

    Bitsy spontaneously remarked, “We must therefore, substitute fossil fuel in all these energy requirements to reduce the carbon dioxide emissions. It’s getting more complicated.”

    Guhu said, “Electricity is generated from many sources. It’s not all fossil fuel. They have 16% by nuclear power, 5.6% by Oil, 19.5% by Natural Gas, 30.5% by coal, and only 18.6 % by renewable sources. The fossil fuels together represent the majority, i.e. 65.6%!”

    “So the fossil fuels add up to 13.2 TW; 9.5 TW for other uses and 3.7 TW for electricity generation. That is 88% of 15 TW of the total.” Bitsy put the figures together.

    Miki said, “That means that of the total fossil fuel consumed, 75% is being burnt for other uses and only about 25% for electricity generation. So in promoting renewable energy for power, we are trying to save what we can from only the one-fourth fraction. I think we must concentrate on the other sector which takes up three-fourth of the fossil fuel consumption.”

    Bitsy said the obvious, “We have to convert the source of energy for the steam for the industry, home heating, and cooking food away from fossil fuels if we want to reduce the fossil fuel consumption.”

    Guhu was more rational. “We must leave no stone unturned. We must try to promote other sources of electricity as demand for energy is increasing by leaps and bounds. If we don’t address the issue, they will take the easy route out and put up more and more coal based thermal power plants. If it is not stemmed, coal will show a marked increase in usage.”

    Miki said, “Among the renewable energy sources, the largest is hydro power. It is the electricity generated when the water stored in a dammed reservoir is sent down a pipe called penstock to the turbine located at a lower altitude which produces the power. As the reservoir gets filled by rain every year, the power source is inexhaustible. All the best sites have been exploited in the developed countries long ago. There is however good prospects in China and the Indian sub-continent.”

    Bitsy added, “But there is now a great awareness of the environmental damage a dam could do. Besides, the displacement of the population from the land which may go under water when the dam is filled is also an impediment to building new big projects. But there is scope for smaller projects called ‘Mini Hydel’ to be established with smaller water capacities befitting the environment.”

    Guhu pointed out, “Now they have a new concept of water power in the form of small do-it-yourself kits. The people living in houses near a flowing stream can put up a small waterwheel to generate power for their home. I think there is sufficient momentum in this field and we will see it grow in the future. China is doing it. Why not elsewhere in the World? Why not on the Mississippi river? We have got to promote that.”

    Miki asked, “Talking of water based generation, what about wave and tidal power from the sea? It could be useful to those living on the coast.”

    Bitsy said, “Sure there are some ways to tap this power and its being done. But the wind from the sea seems to have a bigger potential.”

    Guhu added, “Not only from the sea, but wind energy is also being tapped inland by erecting wind turbines at a rapid pace. The growth of this source has speeded up as it qualifies for Carbon Credit Certificates. The added cash has given a big boost to wind power. From just 10,000 MW in 2000, the capacity has shot up ten times to 100,000 MW in 2008! It’s poised to double every 4 years!”

    Miki said, “The geothermal power could be very useful to substitute fossil fuel in heating homes during winter and cooling them in summer. It’s been promoted by the US department of energy. The temperature below the surface is relatively constant throughout the year; the geothermal pump warms up the fluid down in the Earth and uses it to heat the home during the cold winter. The same system has an accessory which provides domestic hot water for bathing and washing, thus saving substantial energy. It’s being installed in the US in many homes, but we could promote the idea around the world where it snows during the winter and save heating fuel.”

    “I support the idea.” Said Bitsy. “We now know that all these renewable energy sources are very small. They are not going make the slightest dent in the fossil fuel consumption. We need something big. What about solar power?”

    “Solar power is also a good economical substitute for water heaters in tropical countries for heating domestic water for the shower in the bathroom. You need to install rolled sheets on the roof exposed to sunlight and circulate the heated water down in the taps,” replied Miki.

    “That’s one use. But the other is more interesting. There is a way to convert the sunlight directly into electricity by using what is known as photovoltaic cells or PV in short. The largest planned PV station is at Victoria, Australia with a capacity of 154 MW to be commissioned in phases from 2010 to 2013. It is the World’s most advanced PV heliostat solar concentrator power station. Tracking mirrors will concentrate the sunlight on the large PV cells to generate power. It will reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 400,000 tons a year,” explained Guhu.

    “But this is nothing compared to the Palo Verde nuclear reactor in the US, which makes 3,200 MW of power. It saves 8 million tons of greenhouse gases a year! The solar power station looks like a small rose bush in front the big rain tree of the nuclear power plant. I think there doesn’t seem to be anything better than the nuclear power when it comes to saving the gas emissions and at the same time to fulfill the World’s ever increasing appetite for energy!” Observed Bitsy.

    “Good thinking! You have hit the nail on the head, niece.” Guhu complemented her. “We have to concentrate all our energies in pushing the nuclear power fast-forward.”

    Miki said, “We have to think of nuclear power station as a combination of 2 parts: (1) the reactor where steam is generated and (2) the turbine generator which uses the steam to make electricity. We could promote the idea of setting up only the first part near the chemical and food industry and supply them the steam for heating for the process requirements. This will avoid burning of fossil fuels and save the emissions.”

    “That’s brilliant. But I’ll go a step further,” said Bitsy and continued, “the existing coal and gas based thermal power stations also have the two stages, one to make steam and other to use the steam to drive the turbines. They can shut down the first stage and procure the steam from a nuclear station to drive their turbines. Thus the greenhouse gas emissions from the existing power stations could also be saved.”

    “I can foresee that cheap electricity will even make the cement kilns shift from coal to electric heating,” said Miki.

    “Yes nothing is impossible. The steel making furnace is already electric, so why not cement?” added Guhu.

    “I can clearly see some light as how to grapple this gigantic problem. Three fourth of fossil fuel is burnt for heat and only one fourth for electricity. The renewable forms of electricity generation cannot help to reduce the larger component of the fossil fuel consumption. Only nuclear reactors can provide both steam and electricity without adding to the greenhouse gases. The only answer which eMaya can tell the World for reducing emissions on substantial scale is therefore, ‘Nuclear Power’.” Guhu concluded. Bitsy got eMaya to enlighten the World!

    “Hi Friends of CoolWorld,

    This is eMaya. I bring you a perspective of the energy consumption of the World.As much as 85% of the energy requirements of the World are met through fossil fuels, the balance from nuclear and renewable sources. The wind power industry has shown good promise thanks to the cash flow from Carbon Credits and now generates 2% of the total electric power! Other sources like mini hydel, solar, and geothermal have developed momentum for growth.

    But 65% of the energy consumed by the World is as heat and only 35% as electricity. The only way to save fossil fuels substantially is go for nuclear energy, which can create steam as well as electricity to meet bulk of the energy demand. We have to study the method of increasing nuclear energy in a massive and economic way.    Yours, eMaya.”



Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google
  • LinkedIn
  • Live
  • MySpace
  • Propeller
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • YahooMyWeb

Going Green - What’s it All About?

July 27th, 2009 Leave your comment »
green oil
Gen Wright asked:


Green: it’s a word we seem to hear everywhere lately. The skyrocketing price of oil and the ongoing debate about the threat of climate change are only two of the factors that prompt people to think about going green.? Nowadays most people, and even some businesses, realize that we humans have an effect on our environment. There’s no getting around it, and that’s why going green can only benefit all of us.

But what is “green”? Ask 10 people, you’ll get 10 answers. Not even the U.S. government has a standard definition, so consumers must decide for themselves based on various definitions and standards created by different organizations. Usually, the word “green” connotes energy efficiency (a “green”? washing machine that uses less water and electricity, for instance) or environmental friendliness (such as paint stripper made from non-toxic materials). You might even be doing something green without knowing it, perhaps to save money. Have you abandoned commercial cleaning products in favor of using the natural products Grandma used, like baking soda, vinegar and ammonia? That’s green, because you’re opting not to use possibly toxic chemicals in your home!Do you put mulch, compost or manure on your garden instead of chemical fertilizer? That’s green, because you’re reducing the amount of potentially dangerous chemicals right in your own backyard! Do you like to shop for bargains at flea markets or secondhand shops instead of buying something brand new at the mall? That’s green, because you’re “recycling”? already-manufactured goods and most likely using up less packaging that would otherwise swell the town landfill! Even large organizations–schools, local governments or corporations–have gone green by switching from paper to electronic billing (less paper used = fewer trees cut down) or by installing solar panels instead of a new oil heating system.

Developers, architects, contractors, local governments and utilities are also getting into “green building.”? Just as individuals go green by recycling and businesses go green by reducing their paper use, those in real estate, construction, and associated fields can ride the wave of environmental awareness by adopting green concepts. Instead of clearcutting a forest in order to lay out a typical subdivision, some real estate developers have turned their talents toward refurbishing older hometown neighborhoods. Contractors can pledge to avoid arsenic-treated lumber or focus on reusing salvaged or surplus building materials. Architects can incorporate the newest energy-efficient technologies into their designs. In many areas, the local government or utility company is happy to perform an energy audit of a home or commercial building in an effort to reduce energy consumption and waste, and they may be able to supply information about green products and services that are good for the budget and good for the planet. Common products in this category include solar energy devices that can lessen dependence on nonrenewable fossil fuels (i.e., home heating oil), long-lasting fluorescent light bulbs, or safer replacements for harmful “traditional”? materials such as fiberglass insulation.

Consumers can teach themselves how to go green. You can start small, with something as simple as choosing a product at the supermarket that uses less packaging than the one next to it on the shelf. Congratulations–by making that decision, you’ve just reduced the demand for styrofoam, which has the potential to sit in an ugly landfill for hundreds of years. Or you can think big by trading in your gas-guzzling SUV for a gas-sipping hybrid-electric vehicle. The bottom line is, you don’t have to be rich, a scientist, or a tree hugger to go green! You don’t have to change your lifestyle completely in one fell swoop to go green. Every little bit helps, and every little bit adds up to a lot.



Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google
  • LinkedIn
  • Live
  • MySpace
  • Propeller
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • YahooMyWeb

The Advantages of the Hydro Powered Engine

July 23rd, 2009 Leave your comment »
hydro fuel
Matthew Barr asked:


Image a world in which the highways are full of cars but the choking smell of sulfur and carbon monoxide don’t penetrate your lungs and kill you slowly. Imagine a trip of a thousand miles where the gas costs just a few cents. Imagine an engine that never has to be cleaned… and making a hot cup of coffee from the sterilized water coming out of the exhaust. Imagine that the gas station is in your own home, where you prepare as much fuel as you need for your trip, or buying a box of energy in the supermarket. This is the world of the hydrogen powered spark-ignited internal combustion engine… and the technology is already here.

The motor industry has been testing prototypes, and manufacturers like General Motors, BMW, Mercedes, Mazda, Honda and Toyota are all looking at putting these cars on the roads without sacrificing any of the values of dynamism and driving pleasure. BMW even make a sports car that runs on hydrogen that easily goes over 230 MpH. Mazda’s RX-8 Hydrogen RE vehicles are being leased to Japanese companies.

The advantages are clear. Hydrogen is the only known fuel that leaves no pollutants when combusted and is far more powerful than oil. The by-product is water instead of poison gas. But while the technology is here, the cars are not; manufacturers are sitting on the fence waiting to see in which commercial direction the wind will blow.

In the meantime, they’ve taken an intermediate step in the reduction of oil consumption by producing hybrid cars powered by a dual system of electricity and fossil fuels. These use a lot less gas than traditional engines and also reduce pollutant emissions, but they aren’t pretty and they’ve proven to have all the sex appeal of a Star Trek convention. The hydro-engine though is structurally close to the traditional gasoline engines, with just a few modifications. Drivers report that they’re a joy to handle and there’s no need to sacrifice design.

With a bit of luck then, it won’t be too long before we can drive to work, still look cool and enjoy a nice cup of Espresso straight from the exhaust pipe!

This commentary was composed by Urban Neon Car Lights. Check out our website, http://www.urban-neon-car-lights.com/LED-Automotive-Lights-p-1-c-35.html to see a bit more in regard to custom automotive accessories and to peruse a variety of aftermarket vehicle lighting kits.



Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google
  • LinkedIn
  • Live
  • MySpace
  • Propeller
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • YahooMyWeb

Alternative Fuel Sources - We Need Cheaper, Greener Fuel!

July 22nd, 2009 Leave your comment »
hydro fuel
Kenneth Scott asked:


As responsible human beings it is our moral duty that we leave this world a better place than we got it from our ancestors. There is an ardent need for saving the environment that is being polluted by emissions given out by the extensive use of gasoline.

The conventional and traditional fuel sources are becoming more and more expensive to extract and their indiscriminate use in the past century has resulted in their depletion. Alarm bells have already started ringing that these storehouses of natural fuel sources will reach critically low levels and precipitate a crisis much earlier than we think.

However there are promising discoveries that give hope that before any crisis occurs, mankind would have perfected and commercialized alternate sources of fuel that will be eco- friendly and affordable too.

Bio-diesel is one such alternate fuel source that is extracted from plants. Also known as E 85, bio-diesel is partly renewable. Its contents of 15% gasoline and 85% ethanol mean that it is at least better than using pure gasoline.

Although such alternate fuel sources like E 85 score above gasoline, they still pollute and require a vast amount of corn to be grown which in turn translates into availability of lesser land for growing food for people.

Presently, electric cars seem to be the best alternate fuel source that we have, if we are to conserve our natural fuel sources. They are efficient because all of the electricity that they need can be generated at one central location. It is a much better option than consuming petroleum derivatives and polluting more by using small and inefficient combustion motors. Electricity can be produced in any manner that suits the needs on a particular location depending on the resources it has. One can use coal, hydro-electric or wind to produce this electricity that is required for electric cars.

The ultimate alternate fuel source, of course is your own legs on bike peddles. Peddle power is becoming increasingly popular as none of the other alternate fuel sources has completely panned out. Bio-diesel is not widely available and the power that the electric cars allow has not been perfected as yet. The bike is really a flawless machine for short to medium commutes. You will be in better shape, save some money, and do the environment a favor as well.

So, before switching on the ignition of the vehicle, ask yourself if it would not be easier to walk or ride.



Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google
  • LinkedIn
  • Live
  • MySpace
  • Propeller
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • YahooMyWeb

Is Hydrogen a Safe Fuel, Or Not?

July 15th, 2009 Leave your comment »
hydro fuel
Julianne Rowat asked:


en a Safe Fuel, Or Not? How dangerous is hydrogen, lets compare. We all know how dangerous gasoline is. You drop a match on spilled fluid it explodes. Diesel is not as bad as its flash point is a little higher. You can actually hold a match to diesel and light it, although I would not recommend it, the reason for this is the flash point. Gasoline flash point is 536 degrees Fahrenheit where as diesel is 489 degrees Fahrenheit. Hydrogen flash point is almost double that of gasoline or 932 degrees Fahrenheit. Flash point is defined as, lowest temperature at which a liquid can vaporize to form an ignitable mixture in air. So in other words, hydrogen has to be heated a lot higher than gasoline to ignite. Hydrogen gas is also lighter then air, in fact it is 15 times lighter. So if a leak did occur, the hydrogen gas would rise, it would than combine with air and quickly become so sparse that it could not burn. If by a small chance ignition did occur, being lighter than air it would burn upwards and be consumed quickly. Gasoline and diesel vapors on the other hand are heavier than air and will not disperse but will follow the contour of the ground. If ignited it would spread rapidly. These vapors also have a lower ignition temperature so the chance of ignition is greater. With gasoline you also have a larger chance of an explosion. Petroleum products are poisonous to humans and considered asphyxiates Hydrogen is actually a naturally occurring element and is non toxic. Petroleum products produce CO2 which is expelled into the air, while hydrogen produces O2. This is why when you leave a car running in a closed garage it could cause your death. This death is caused by too much carbon dioxide entering your body. It triggers your brain to speed up your breathing to get rid of excess CO2. Too much CO2 changes acid level in the body and in turns causes your death. When pure hydrogen and pure oxygen is burned only pure water is produced. So when hydrogen is introduced into an engine it actually cleans the ambient air by burning the excess hydrocarbon. By burning the excess hydrocarbon you start pushing oxygen instead of carbon dioxide out your tail pipe. With oxygen coming out our tail pipe instead of carbon dioxide, what do you think that it is going to do to our environment? In comparison petroleum products produces carbon monoxide, nitrogen oxides and hydrogen sulfide. None of which is good for the environment. As you can see introducing hydrogen into the fuel really helps in cleaning up our environment and as a bonus it will increase your fuel mileage. Fuel mileage increases from burning more of the fuel that enters your engine. The more fueled burned the less fuel is wasted out the tail pipes. With all these factors taken in consideration, hydrogen fuel is a pretty safe fuel and better for the environment when used correctly. Just remember, as with any other fuel if used incorrectly it can and will be dangerous. This is especially true in a closed area. But used correctly you not only will be able to increase our mileage you will also help save our air quality.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google
  • LinkedIn
  • Live
  • MySpace
  • Propeller
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • YahooMyWeb

"it’s so Easy, Being Green"

July 11th, 2009 Leave your comment »
green oil
Christian Jacobsen asked:


With oil and natural gas prices rocketing, stoking terror of long, cold and and expensive winters, a renewed interest in keeping heating costs under control has has been sparked. Homeowner’s have an ignited passion in understanding energy saving methods. If you’re in this boat, stuck in cold waters, here are some tips for energy saving tricks of the trade.

If you’re living in a home with a furnace that’s more than 20 years old, you may have already attempted the “buy a sweater” method of keeping warm. This is certainly one approach, but these days upgrading your home’s conditioning system is a much better option, and will bode well for you in the here and now, and in the long term, should you decide sell your home. More and more, homebuyers are looking for homes with energy efficient systems already in place. So, think of these upgrades as a long term investment in the resale value of your home, as well a cost efficient and green alternative to your current conditioning system.

Now, with that old choker of a furnace huffin’ and puffin’ away, guaranteed it’s not as efficient as it could be, no matter what fuel type it uses. The newer gas furnaces are mid-efficiency (78-82%) or high efficiency (89-96%). Although the higher efficiency products can cost up to $1000 more than the mid-efficiency products, extra costs will be re-couped in a couple years, as they will burn less fuel. And, you’ll be the greenest frog on the block, sending less harmful emissions out into the atmosphere. “It’s so easy being green”, murmured Kermit, once he upgraded his furnace.

With oil furnaces, there are again, much more efficient products on the market as of late. But, a oil furnace does need to partner with a good chimney, and so this may be an additional cost to keep in mind

Take note, it’s still the case that electric heat is more expensive than oil and gas, although a smart combination of central woodstove heat, supplemented by electric heat can be cost efficient.

Let it Flow: Change Your Filters!

Whether disposable or washable, all forced-air heating/cooling systems use filters. And, these filters need to be maintained and changed. Some filters require monthly changes while other last up to three months, and much depends on the conditions within your home. A dirty filter will restrict air flow and with clogged filters you’re blocking heat that would otherwise be keeping you toasty warm. Do yourself a favor and keep on top of the regular changing of your heat filters. This is a pretty easy way to boost your energy efficiency and cut costs.

Pump it up: Install a Heat Pump

Air source heat pumps are the most common and they are generally used with a back-up heating system. In terms of function a heat pump works by extracting heat from the outside and bringing it in, (in heat mode), and by removing heat from the inside of the house and releasing it outside. ( in cooling mode).

The king of heat pumps, though, are ground and watersource, or geothermal. And while the initial investment may be great, the saving will be substantial in the long run. These pumps will use 25-50% less energy than conventional conditioning systems.

At the end of the day, another simple method to help with soaring heat bills, is to keep an eye on the set temperature levels in your house, What is normally described as room temperature is around 68 Fahrenheit (20 degrees celsius). Of course, only you can decide where to set the dial. But, if you’d rather avoid the ” put on a sweater” method of winter energy conservation, you might consider investing in an improved conditioning system that’ll bring you warmth today, and will be a smart investment in the re-sale value of your home.



Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google
  • LinkedIn
  • Live
  • MySpace
  • Propeller
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • YahooMyWeb